Methodology Notes
Archaeological Documentation • Screenshot Stew Investigation • 2025-10-04
Turtle Archaeology Approach
Brief methodology notes documenting the turtle archaeology approach with initial site survey, discovery methodology (progressive excavation, cross-reference, sacred profanity preservation, pattern recognition), key themes, and next excavation steps.
Initial Site Survey
Surface Artifacts
- Screenshots from September 30, 2025
- Claude Code session logs
- File system structure and organization
- Git commit history and messages
- Documentation files (READMEs, handbooks)
Initial Observations
- High density of activity in 11-minute window (21:52-22:03)
- Consistent use of
::patterns across sessions - Sacred profanity markers ("derssssssh", "le sigh indeed")
- Terminal-native focus (ratatui, Rust)
- MCP integration patterns emerging
Discovery Methodology
1. Progressive Excavation
Start with surface artifacts (screenshots, file names) and progressively dig deeper into content (code, documentation, commit messages).
- Layer 1: Screenshots and timestamps
- Layer 2: File names and directory structure
- Layer 3: Code content and documentation
- Layer 4: Git history and commit messages
- Layer 5: Cross-references and connections
2. Cross-Reference Mapping
Track connections between artifacts across time, platforms, and contexts.
- Temporal connections (2020 → 2025)
- Platform connections (web → terminal)
- Language connections (JavaScript → Rust)
- Pattern connections (automation → queryable data)
3. Sacred Profanity Preservation
Preserve authentic language as authentication markers and emotional/cognitive state indicators.
- "derssssssh" - Frustration or breakthrough moment
- "le sigh indeed" - Resignation or acceptance
- "because I could" - Engineering protocol marker
- Casual precision - Authentic voice preservation
4. Pattern Recognition
Identify recurring patterns across artifacts, contexts, and time periods.
- Temporal patterns (hyperfocus bursts, 37-minute miracle)
- Architectural patterns (terminal-native, queryable data)
- Cognitive patterns (neurodivergent-friendly design)
- Development patterns ("shacks not cathedrals")
Key Themes
Hyperfocus Bursts
11-minute burst (21:52-22:03) with 5 Claude Code sessions, followed by 37-minute complete implementation. Demonstrates neurodivergent development patterns as competitive advantage.
FLOAT Block Evolution
5-year evolution from Draft.js/JavaScript web automation to ratatui/Rust terminal-native queryable infrastructure. Core patterns remain consistent despite platform/language shifts.
Consciousness Technology
:: patterns evolved from personal cognitive architecture to queryable infrastructure for AI agent integration via MCP. Patterns are infrastructure, not implementation details.
Neurodivergent-Friendly Systems
Design principles optimized for neurodivergent cognition enable faster development, better pattern recognition, and professional integration. Not accommodations, but competitive advantages.
Next Excavation Steps
- Deeper dive into Rangle documents (2020-2021) for professional integration patterns
- Trace MCP integration evolution across projects
- Document rot-field system architecture and queryable data structures
- Map consciousness pattern usage across all 30+ ritual forest projects
- Analyze sacred profanity frequency and context across time periods
- Validate hyperfocus burst patterns in other development sessions
- Document "shacks not cathedrals" philosophy across project lifecycle
Related Pages
Methodology Insights
Comprehensive retrospective on what worked well in the archaeological investigation
Synthesis & Connections
Master narrative arc connecting all discoveries into a cohesive story
Consciousness Tech Patterns
Archaeological fragment documenting :: dispatch patterns as queryable infrastructure