Skip to main content

Methodology Notes

Archaeological Documentation • Screenshot Stew Investigation • 2025-10-04

Turtle Archaeology Approach

Brief methodology notes documenting the turtle archaeology approach with initial site survey, discovery methodology (progressive excavation, cross-reference, sacred profanity preservation, pattern recognition), key themes, and next excavation steps.

Initial Site Survey

Surface Artifacts

  • Screenshots from September 30, 2025
  • Claude Code session logs
  • File system structure and organization
  • Git commit history and messages
  • Documentation files (READMEs, handbooks)

Initial Observations

  • High density of activity in 11-minute window (21:52-22:03)
  • Consistent use of :: patterns across sessions
  • Sacred profanity markers ("derssssssh", "le sigh indeed")
  • Terminal-native focus (ratatui, Rust)
  • MCP integration patterns emerging

Discovery Methodology

1. Progressive Excavation

Start with surface artifacts (screenshots, file names) and progressively dig deeper into content (code, documentation, commit messages).

  • Layer 1: Screenshots and timestamps
  • Layer 2: File names and directory structure
  • Layer 3: Code content and documentation
  • Layer 4: Git history and commit messages
  • Layer 5: Cross-references and connections

2. Cross-Reference Mapping

Track connections between artifacts across time, platforms, and contexts.

  • Temporal connections (2020 → 2025)
  • Platform connections (web → terminal)
  • Language connections (JavaScript → Rust)
  • Pattern connections (automation → queryable data)

3. Sacred Profanity Preservation

Preserve authentic language as authentication markers and emotional/cognitive state indicators.

  • "derssssssh" - Frustration or breakthrough moment
  • "le sigh indeed" - Resignation or acceptance
  • "because I could" - Engineering protocol marker
  • Casual precision - Authentic voice preservation

4. Pattern Recognition

Identify recurring patterns across artifacts, contexts, and time periods.

  • Temporal patterns (hyperfocus bursts, 37-minute miracle)
  • Architectural patterns (terminal-native, queryable data)
  • Cognitive patterns (neurodivergent-friendly design)
  • Development patterns ("shacks not cathedrals")

Key Themes

Hyperfocus Bursts

11-minute burst (21:52-22:03) with 5 Claude Code sessions, followed by 37-minute complete implementation. Demonstrates neurodivergent development patterns as competitive advantage.

FLOAT Block Evolution

5-year evolution from Draft.js/JavaScript web automation to ratatui/Rust terminal-native queryable infrastructure. Core patterns remain consistent despite platform/language shifts.

Consciousness Technology

:: patterns evolved from personal cognitive architecture to queryable infrastructure for AI agent integration via MCP. Patterns are infrastructure, not implementation details.

Neurodivergent-Friendly Systems

Design principles optimized for neurodivergent cognition enable faster development, better pattern recognition, and professional integration. Not accommodations, but competitive advantages.

Next Excavation Steps

  • Deeper dive into Rangle documents (2020-2021) for professional integration patterns
  • Trace MCP integration evolution across projects
  • Document rot-field system architecture and queryable data structures
  • Map consciousness pattern usage across all 30+ ritual forest projects
  • Analyze sacred profanity frequency and context across time periods
  • Validate hyperfocus burst patterns in other development sessions
  • Document "shacks not cathedrals" philosophy across project lifecycle

Related Pages